Astronomy 302
Lecture 1 & 2
Telescopes, Optics, & Imaging
(Read Karttunen
Fundamental Astronomy, 4th ed. Chap 3)
1.0 The Atmosphere
Clearly the first issue that our light faces (after a long
journey) is
the Earth's atmosphere.
The atmosphere has several effects:
1) It absorbs some frequencies of the the light
Hence, the transmission of the
atmosphere is a strong function of lambda
Figure 1: the atmosphere (Karttunen)
As you can see there are several windows in the atmosphere --
these
bands define the astronomical bands
Fig 2: close up of the UV-radio sections
Fig 3: The J (1.05-1.4 um), H
(1.5-1.8), and K (2-2.5 um) Near IR bands (gemini)
2) The atmosphere also introduces small phase errors in the
wavefront
of the incoming light

Fig 4: (from
Michael
Richmond ) shows the effects of seeing on the position of a star
3) The background light (light pollution) can make deep
optical images
difficult to obtain

Fig 5: effects of light pollution (Karttunen)
2.0 Characteristics of a good site
1) It should be high
(minimizes light
loss to Atmosphere, and leads to best seeing)
2) It should be dry (maximizes sky transmission in IR)
3) It should be dark (minimizes Optical background)
4) It should be clear (maximizes sky throughput)
5) It must have low winds, and low turbulence, and a large ro
(good seeing)
6) It must have minimal snow load
In the end there are *very* few places on Earth that are truly
exceptional for telescopes.
The best site is arguably Mauna
Kea which has the best seeing of any site (why is that?)
there are also outstanding sites in Chile, like ESO's Paranal, and UA's twin 6.5m Magellan Telescopes
3.0 TELESCOPE OPTICS

Fig 6: The basic types of telescopes for the eye (Karttunen)

Fig 7: The principal of angular magnification of a Refractor (Karttunen)
The diameter of the objective lens (D) is the "aperture of
the
telescope"
the focal length the is lens
is f
the ratio of f/D = focal
ratio = F
example: a 1 m lens with a
focal length of 10 m would be an f/10 lens
the smaller the focal ratio the "faster" the optic, the stronger the
curvature of the lens, the more expensive it is to build
3.1 PLATESCALE
One of the most important
concepts of a
telescope is the platescale of
the focal plane
of the telescope. By this we mean how many mm does an object of
angle u
make at the
focal plane.
When the Object is seen at
angle u on the sky it forms
an image of
height s (see fig 7).
Therefore:
s = f tan(u)
since u is a small angle (in
radians) we can use the small angle approximation and have
s=fu
for a professional telescope (like the 61inch) we may not know f. But
we do know the f/ratio (F) of the secondary mirror
and the size of the primary.

A Cassegrain telescope like the 61 inch. (Karttunen)
and so a more universal formula is (where the diameter of M1 is D):
s=FDu
example: How big is a 10
arcsec image on the sky in mm for the 61inch (D=1.54 m) with the
F=f/13.5
cassegrain secondary?
s = 13.5 * 1.54e3 * (10./
(60*60)*3.1415/180)
= 1.007 mm
But what about the magnification of the telescope?
3.2 ANGULAR MAGNIFICATION
It is clear that a refractor (see Fig
7) produces an angular magnification of:
Mag = u'/u ~ f/f'
so the angular magnification
is simply
the ratio of the Objective focal length (f) to
the focal length of the eyepiece (f').
example: What is the angular magnification of the 61" if we placed a 20
mm eyepiece on it?
Mag = 13.5 * 1.54e3 / 20 =
1039x
which is pretty good.
Note that Mag only depends on f and not D. In other words one could
build a 1 mm telescope with a focal length
of 1 m that would give the same angular magnification as the 61 inch.
So why build big telescopes
(Especially if cost ~ D3) ?
3.3 DIFFRACTION
Real Airy PSFs in the Mid-IR from the MMT AO system (Close et al. 2003
ApJ)

How does this effect resolution?
3.4 DIFFRACTION-LIMITED RESOLUTION
Resolution is the critical issue for many applications of
imaging.

fig 11: Resolution with Airy PSFs (Karttunen)
There is the classic (but too conservative) Rayleigh limit of
1.22lambda/D (see Fig 11 (c))
but we can do better (we are astronomers!)

Fig12: Adaptive optics (AO) images from the MMT (Close et al. 2003, ApJ)
The Dawes limit of the FWHM (Full Width at Half Maxima) of a single PSF
is really closer
to the true limit of resolution (see fig 11 (e)). For a typical
diffraction-limited Cassegrain telescope
with a central obscuration of ~0.2, the FWHM of the Airy pattern is
0.98lamda/D or ~lambda/D, therefore:
Resolution of a diffraction limited
telescope is ~lambda/D radians
example: At the MMT with the
AO system we can achieve a resolution of
2.2/6.5e6*206264 = 0.069" or
69 mas (milliarcseconds) in the K-band (2.2 microns)
What happens in the optical (or in the IR without AO) ?
3.5 SEEING LIMITED RESOLUTION
Now if we don't use AO then the atmosphere has messed up the
images.
Although the starlight is still coherent it has strong departures from
a flat
wavefront. Therefore, only little parts of the telescope pupil
interfere and so
there are many diffraction-limited "speckles" that move around on
millisecond
timescales. So any images that have exposure times longer than ~50
milliseconds
will be seeing limited!

Look here
for more about the above movie
(and how speckle interferometry can help!)
Now most objects are too faint for speckle interferometry and so almost
all
ground-based observations in the the optical are seeing-limited.
This means:
FWHMseeing ~ lambda/ro
radians
where the freid parameter (ro ) is typically 10cm in the
optical (V band)
hence FWHMseeing ~ 1" at V
But if there is a lot of turbulence in the atmosphere in the direction
the telescope is looking then ro can
be as small as 2 cm (5" seeing!). On the other
hand if night is really good at a good site ro
can be as big as 20 cm (0.5" seeing!).
Most good sites have seeing from 0.4-1.5", with medians of 0.6-0.7".
The 61" has 1-2" seeing typically, while the MMT is closer to 0.5-1.5".
NOTES: since ro ~ lambda6/5 the seeing is slightly better at
longer lambda
FWHMseeing ~ lambda-1/5
Will talk more about these issues in the AO lectures.
3.6 WIDE FIELD SEEING LIMITED IMAGING
Since the time averaged
turbulence is similar over the field of view (FOV) of
most cameras, it is safe to assume that the PSFs of all the stars in
the FOV will
have a similar shape (to within noise limits) and so a long image at
the 61inch
might look like:

Fig 14: 61inch f/13.5 Cassegrain B,V, and I filter images of NGC 6791
from Dr. Betsy Green
(this is an open cluster and the Blue stragglers and O/B subdwarfs are
marked)
3.7 Color Magnitude Diagram
By measuring the flux (or magnitude) of stars in a cluster we can
construct a color
magnitude diagram (like in Project #1).
Below is an example of a color magnitude diagram for the globular
cluster M55.

from here.
Note since all the stars are roughly the same age
they trace an isochrone.
You should be able to trace stars of increasing mass up the main
sequence (MS)
to the MS turn-off then to red giant branch (RGB), the horizontal
branch (HB) then the Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB). See here for
more info

We will learn how to take and reduce similar data
in this class!